‘Ancient episteme’ and the nature of fossils: a correction of a modern scholarly error

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 38 (1):90-116 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Beginning the nineteenth-century and continuing down to the present, many authors writing on the history of geology and paleontology have attributed the theory that fossils were inorganic formations produced within the earth, rather than by the deposition of living organisms, to the ancient Greeks and Romans. Some have even gone so far as to claim this was the consensus view in the classical period up through the Middle Ages. In fact, such a notion was entirely foreign to ancient and medieval thought and only appeared within the manifold of ‘Renaissance episteme,’ the characteristics of which have often been projected backwards by some historians onto earlier periods. This paper endeavors to correct this error, explain the development of the Renaissance view, describe certain ancient precedents thereof, and trace the history of the misinterpretation in the literature.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Spartan Tradition in European Thought. [REVIEW]James J. Tierney - 1971 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 20:275-277.
History.Richard Tuck - 1996 - In Robert E. Goodin, Philip Pettit & Thomas Winfried Menko Pogge (eds.), A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 69–87.
The Edinburgh Critical History of Middle Ages and Renaissance Philosophy.Andrew LaZella & Richard A. Lee (eds.) - 2020 - Edinburgh: Edinburgh Critical History of Philosophy.
H.John Haldane - 1994 - In Samuel D. Guttenplan (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Blackwell. pp. 333–347.
Fearing Spouses in Aristotle's Ta Oikonomika.Daniel Nolan - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (1):1-8.
Thales – the ‘first philosopher’? A troubled chapter in the historiography of philosophy.Lea Cantor - 2022 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 30 (5):727-750.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-25

Downloads
25 (#887,547)

6 months
5 (#1,062,008)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The presocratic philosophers.Jonathan Barnes - 1982 - New York: Routledge.
Lives of Eminent Philosophers.Diogenes Laertius - 1925 - London: W. Heinemann. Edited by Robert Drew Hicks.

View all 47 references / Add more references