Wiggins and Ross

Utilitas 10 (3):281-285 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ross's attempt to undermine the consequentialist understanding of the relation between duties and outcomes might give him greater defence against the danger that outcome-related duties will come to constitute a norm, to the disadvantage of all others

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
100 (#211,576)

6 months
9 (#489,609)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Dancy
University of Texas at Austin

Citations of this work

Virtue Ethics and Particularism.Constantine Sandis - 2021 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 95 (1):205-232.
What’s wrong with Moorean buck-passing?Francesco Orsi - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (3):727-746.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On What’s Intentionally Done.Jennifer Hornsby - 1993 - In Stephen Shute, John Gardner & Jeremy Horder (eds.), Action and value in criminal law. New York: Oxford University Press.

Add more references