Probabilism Today: Permissibility and Multi-Account Ethics

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (2):235-250 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In ethics, ‘probabilism’ refers to a position defended by a number of Catholic theologians, mainly in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. They held that, when one is uncertain which of a range of actions is the right one to perform, it is permissible to perform any which has a good chance of being the right one—even if there is another which has a better chance. This paper considers the value of this position from the viewpoint of modern ethical philosophy. The unusual nature of probabilism as a theory focusing upon permissibility, rather than right-making properties, is explored and related to some modern attempts to set out ‘satisficing’ and ‘hybrid’ ethical theories. Such theories try to distinguish between what is best and what is permissible, and probabilism can be understood as an alternative way of supplementing a theory of right-making properties by adding to it a theory of permissibility. But a more radical version is also possible, where one abandons any attempt to identify right actions or right-making properties, and instead considers permissibility alone. Accordingly, a ‘multi-account theory’ of permissibility is proposed and defended as a model of how many people actually make moral decisions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A right to suicide does not entail a right to assisted death.M. Gunderson - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (1):51-54.
Compossible Rights Must Restrict Speech.John T. H. Wong - 2022 - Dissertation, University of Hong Kong
Morality and Risk.David Patrick Mccarthy - 1995 - Dissertation, University of Southern California
Elbow room for self-defense.Eric Mack - 2016 - Social Philosophy and Policy 32 (2):18-39.
Ethical Theory, Completeness & Consistency.Andrew Moore - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (3):297-308.
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics.Rosalind Hursthouse - 1986 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 20:35-53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
44 (#529,991)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The moral problem.Michael R. Smith - 1994 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
The methods of ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1907 - Bristol, U.K.: Thoemmes Press. Edited by Emily Elizabeth Constance Jones.
Virtue and Reason.John McDowell - 1979 - The Monist 62 (3):331-50.

View all 26 references / Add more references