- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A comparison of the scientific quality of publicly and privately funded randomized controlled drug trials
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (6):1322-1325 (2010)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Appraising the quality of randomized controlled trials: inter‐rater reliability for the OTseeker evidence database.Leigh Tooth, Annie McCluskey, Tammy Hoffmann, Kryss McKenna & Meryl Lovarini - 2005 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (6):547-555.
Bias in recruitment to cluster randomized trials: a review of recent publications. [REVIEW]Gwen Brierley, Sally Brabyn, David Torgerson & Judith Watson - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (4):878-886.
Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials: the need for complete data.Michael J. Clarke & Lesley A. Stewart - 1995 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1 (2):119-126.
Analysis of scientific truth status in controlled rehabilitation trials.Roger Kerry, Aurélien Madouasse, Antony Arthur & Stephen D. Mumford - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):617-625.
Cluster randomized controlled trials.Suezann Puffer, David J. Torgerson & Judith Watson - 2005 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (5):479-483.
On the scientific inference from clinical trials.L. Holmberg, M. Baum & H. O. Adami Md - 1999 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (2):157-162.
Poor reporting quality of key Randomization and Allocation Concealment details is still prevalent among published RCTs in 2011: a review.Laura Clark, Ulrike Schmidt, Puvan Tharmanathan, Joy Adamson, Catherine Hewitt & David Torgerson - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):703-707.
Problems associated with randomized controlled clinical trials in breast cancer.Ann E. Johnson - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (2):119-126.
Comparing the Clinical Trial Characteristics of Industry-Funded Trials and Non Industry-Funded Trials.Emily Hughes, Tamara Van Bakel, Ashley Raudanskis, Prachi Ray, Benazir Hodzic-Santor, Ushma Purohit, Chana A. Sacks & Michael Fralick - 2024 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 52 (3):693-700.
Comparison of the efficacy of three PubMed search filters in finding randomized controlled trials to answer clinical questions.Reza Yousefi-Nooraie, Shirin Irani, Soroush Mortaz-Hedjri & Behnam Shakiba - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (5):723-726.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-24
Downloads
25 (#877,287)
6 months
3 (#1,471,287)
2013-11-24
Downloads
25 (#877,287)
6 months
3 (#1,471,287)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
References found in this work
The Economic Laws of Scientific Research.T. Kealey - 2001 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 13 (4):117-120.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-zm6qt uwo