- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The invocation of clio: A response
Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (1):3-44 (2005)
Abstract
The Summer 2004 issue of the "Journal of Religious Ethics" included papers by James Wetzel, Gordon Michalson, Jennifer Herdt, and David Craig that assessed my interpretation of certain historical figures and texts. These papers also considered the place of those interpretations in my normative theology. This response spells out the relationship, as I see it, between historical inquiry and theological utterance and then addresses some of the concerns posed in those papersAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Introduction: Parts, Wholes, and Opposites: John Milbank as Geisteshistoriker.John Bowlin - 2004 - Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):257 - 269.
Naves and Nukes: John Ruskin as "Augustinian" Social Theorist?David M. Craig - 2004 - Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):325 - 356.
Soft Facts and Harsh Realities: Reply to William Craig.John Martin Fischer - 1991 - Religious Studies 27 (4):523 - 539.
Timely Reformation Scholarship and Theology versus the Grand Historical Narratives: A Review Essay.Joan Lockwood O’Donovan - 2018 - Studies in Christian Ethics 31 (4):463-470.
A Response to Three Discussions of My Professional Work and Thought.Eugene C. Hargrove - 2024 - Environmental Ethics 46 (3):255-266.
Kant and the creation of freedom: a response to Terry Godlove.Christopher J. Insole - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (2):111-128.
Recovering the Pastness of the Past: A Response to the Focus on Eighteenth-Century Ethics.J. B. Schneewind - 2000 - Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (2):285 - 293.
Re‐Reading the Post‐Kantian Tradition with Milbank.Gordon E. Michalson - 2004 - Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):357-383.
Observations on some papers presented at the Shanghai forum, October 2010.Alex C. Michalos - 2012 - Asian Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):5-13.
Response to Cohen, Comesaña, Goodman, Nagel, and Weatherson on Gettier Cases in Epistemic Logic.Timothy Williamson - 2013 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 56 (1):77-96.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-24
Downloads
32 (#708,450)
6 months
5 (#1,047,105)
2010-08-24
Downloads
32 (#708,450)
6 months
5 (#1,047,105)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Before the original position: The neo‐orthodox theology of the young John Rawls.Eric Gregory - 2007 - Journal of Religious Ethics 35 (2):179-206.
References found in this work
Religion and rational theology.Immanuel Kant (ed.) - 1996 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Theoretical philosophy, 1755-1770.Immanuel Kant - 1992 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by David Walford & Ralf Meerbote.
Parerga and paralipomena: short philosophical essays.Arthur Schopenhauer (ed.) - 1974 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Religion and Faction in Hume's Moral Philosophy.Jennifer A. Herdt - 1997 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Genealogy of nihilism: philosophies of nothing and the difference of theology.Conor Cunningham - 2002 - New York: Routledge.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-xlp8h uwo