Proof of the Existence of Universals—and Roman Ingarden’s Ontology

Metaphysica 10 (1):65-87 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper ends with an argument that says: necessarily, if there are finitely spatially extended particulars, then there are monadic universals. Before that, in order to characterize the distinction between particulars and universals, Roman Ingarden’s notions of existential moments and modes (ways) of being are presented, and a new pair of such existential moments is introduced: multiplicity–monadicity. Also, it is argued that there are not only real universals, but instances of universals (tropes) and fictional universals too.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Indiscernible universals.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60 (6):604-624.
Universals and particulars: readings in ontology.Michael J. Loux (ed.) - 1970 - Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Universals and particulars in a phenomenalist ontology.E. D. Klemke - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (3):254-261.
On the Nature of Universals.Nicholas Wolterstorff - 1970 - In Michael J. Loux, Universals and particulars: readings in ontology. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
The Physical Basis of Predication.Andrew Newman - 1992 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
151 (#155,488)

6 months
6 (#622,431)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?