Bayesianism and the Idea of Scientific Rationality

Croatian Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):33-43 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bayesianism has been dubbed as the most adequate and successful theory of scientific rationality. Its success mainly lies in its ability to combine two mutually exclusive elements involved in the process of theory-selection in science, viz.: the subjective and objective elements. My aim in this paper is to explain and evaluate Bayesianism’s account of scientific rationality by contrasting it with two other accounts.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,024

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bayesianism and the rationality of scientific inference. [REVIEW]Jon Dorling - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (2):181-190.
Scientific Rationality.Michael Bert Kruse - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Consensus in Science.Miriam Solomon - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 10:193-204.
Mathematics, Science, and Confirmation Theory.Christopher Pincock - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):959-970.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-29

Downloads
24 (#946,589)

6 months
1 (#1,588,578)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeremiah Joven Joaquin
De La Salle University

Citations of this work

Analytic Philosophy in the Philippines.Jeremiah Joven Joaquin - 2022 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):1-32.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references