On the Composition of the Prototractatus

Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):1–20 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wittgenstein's 'Prototractatus' raises difficult textual questions concerning both its structure and the date of its composition. I provide an account of the structure of the 'Prototractatus' by investigating the hitherto unexplored connections between it and other early Wittgenstein manuscripts. I then consider the two most influential proposals on its date of composition, made by von Wright and McGuinness, and argue that neither of them stands up to scrutiny. I make an alternative suggestion, and discuss its implications for the significance of the 'Prototractatus' in the study of Wittgenstein's early philosophy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Prototractatus. [REVIEW]B. W. A. - 1972 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (3):575-576.
A Missing Folio at the Beginning of Wittgenstein's MS 104.Martin Pilch - 2015 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 4 (2):65-97.
Wittgenstein's Texts and Style.David G. Stern - 2017 - In Hans-Johann Glock & John Hyman (eds.), A Companion to Wittgenstein. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 41–55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
96 (#220,891)

6 months
12 (#311,239)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jinho Kang
Seoul National University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references