Anthropomorphism as a methodological problem of animal ethics (in the memory of Sir Patrick Bateson)

Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 7 (3-4):169-176 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper aims to highlight the serious methodological issue of contemporary bioethics (especially topics on the subject of animal ethics). In the discourse on the issue of the pain and suffering of animals and in derived questions, a certain form of anthropomorphism is manifested. Ethical applications of empirical research results that are relevant to humans (or humans as an anatomically and physiologically analogous animal species) are preferred. Subsequently, these extrapolations serve as a criterion for judging the qualitative level of the capabilities of all animals. Serious ethical conclusions are drawn from this reduction.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Critical Anthropomorphism and Animal Ethics.Fredrik Karlsson - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (5):707-720.
A moderate Buddhist animal research ethics.Andrew Fenton - 2019 - Developing World Bioethics 19 (2):106-115.
‘Other Animal Ethics’ and the Demand for Difference.Elisa Aaltola - 2002 - Environmental Values 11 (2):193-209.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-07-01

Downloads
9 (#1,526,266)

6 months
6 (#866,322)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Do Animals Feel Pain?Peter Harrison - 1991 - Philosophy 66 (255):25-40.

Add more references