The Rediscovery of Tense: A Reply to Oaklander

Philosophy 69 (268):231 - 233 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,108

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A reply to Oaklander.Richard M. Gale - 1977 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (2):234-238.
Reply to Oaklander.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2017 - Manuscrito 40 (1):67-73.
Two concepts of education? A reply to D. J. O'Connor.Ruth M. Jonathan - 1982 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 16 (2):147–154.
Response to Comments on Time, Tense, and Causation.Michael Tooley - 2001 - In L. Nathan Oaklander, The Importance of Time. Dordrecht: Kluwer. pp. 31 – 58.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
43 (#541,965)

6 months
4 (#866,409)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thank Goodness It's over.L. Nathan Oaklander - 1992 - Philosophy 67 (260):256 - 258.

Add more references