Public Finance in Poland in a COVID Fog: A Look Through the Lens of Fiscal Transparency and Accountability

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 67 (1):375-396 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Goal – The aim of the article is to identify dysfunctional phenomena (implementation of specific mechanisms/solutions and actions taken), generating increased opacity and limit the responsibility/accountability of public finance in Poland, exacerbated by the COVID-19 crisis. Methods – descriptive analysis, comparative analysis and financial analysis methods were used. Results – fiscal transparency and accountability in Poland is limited by: the marginalisation of the role of the state budget, the loosening of the stabilising expenditure rule, the creation of financial mechanisms based on special funds fed by repayable financing sources for the implementation of state tasks, inter alia, in the fight against the effects of the COVID-19 crisis, the use of national and EU methodologies for calculating the deficit and debt of the public sector in order to conceal part of them, the lack of a consolidated financial statement of the public finance sector.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,302

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Debudgetisation of Polish Public Finances.Jolanta Szołno-Koguc - 2022 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 67 (1):547-569.
Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Public Debt – International Perspective.Jacek Sierak & Michał Bitner - 2022 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 67 (1):269-295.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-11

Downloads
23 (#983,168)

6 months
8 (#390,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

P.[author unknown] - 1926 - Philosophical Review 35:122-145.

Add more references