The Stranger’s Case : Refugees and Moral Rights

Abstract

Using the events in Sweden in the autumn of 2015 as a practical example, this paper examines the question of whether there are circumstances when it is morally permissible for rich, democratic states to close their borders to asylum-seekers. To lay a common ground, the author starts by looking at the right of asylum-seekers, who a refugee is, and what obligations a host country have towards them. Thus, after looking at general human rights, and how they apply to the right to seek asylum, the author turns to the question of who a refugee is, and the difference between refugees according to the 1951 Geneva Convention, and people who are in need of subsidiary protection, before choosing to use UNHCR’s wider definition of a refugee. While acknowledging that refugees have specific rights that other persons in need of protection do not, all asylum-seekers are entitled to not be sent back to a place of danger. Though both groups are entitled to stay on in the country, the temporary status for those in need of subsidiary protection raises some questions about integration and their standing in society and therefore the question of membership rights is discussed before the author returns to the events in Sweden in 2015 and argues that there are circumstances when it is morally acceptable for a country to close its borders to refugees, but that there are limitations when this can be done and for how long. Finally, it is argued that a system that prevents countries from having to – or choosing to – close their borders to refugees is needed. The author discusses whether the grounds for such a system could be found in the work that UNHCR does, and if the DAC agreement can be used as a model for fair distribution.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

LGBTQ ASYLUM AND REFUGEE PROTECTION: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS.Matthew J. Lister - 2024 - Capital University Law Review 52 (1):129-151.
Philosophical Foundations for Complementary Protection.Matthew J. Lister - 2019 - In David Miller & Christine Straehle, The Political Philosophy of Refuge. Cambridge University Press. pp. 211-231.
March of refugees: an act of civil disobedience.Ali Emre Benli - 2018 - Journal of Global Ethics 14 (3):315-331.
The Right to Refuge, and What Happens Next.Eilidh Beaton - 2020 - Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania
Reframing the refugee crisis: from rescue to interconnection.Serena Parekh - 2020 - Ethics and Global Politics 13 (1):21-32.
Climate Change Refugees.Matthew Lister - 2014 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (5):618-634.
The Political Philosophy of Refuge.David Miller & Christine Straehle (eds.) - 2019 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-17

Downloads
23 (#983,168)

6 months
3 (#1,061,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karin Jardstam
Umeå University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Who are Refugees?Matthew Lister* - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (5):645-671.
The Dark Side of Human Rights1.Onora O’Neill - 2009 - In Thomas Christiano & John Philip Christman, Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 17--425.
A liberal theory of asylum.Andy Lamey - 2012 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (3):235-257.

Add more references