Measuring inaccuracy of uncertain doxastic states in many-valued logical systems

Journal of Applied Logic 14:95-112 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,830

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Logical paradoxes for many-valued systems.Moh Shaw-Kwei - 1954 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (1):37-40.
Doxastic logic: a new approach.Daniel Rönnedal - 2018 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 28 (4):313-347.
Identity, many-valuedness and referentiality.Grzegorz Malinowski - 2013 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 22 (4):375-387.
Measuring coherence using LP-models.Carlos A. OLLER - 2004 - Journal of Applied Logic 2 (4):451-455.
Finitely many-valued paraconsistent systems.Roman Tuziak - 1997 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 5:121-127.
Many‐Valued, Free, and Intuitionistic Logics.Richard Grandy - 2002 - In Dale Jacquette (ed.), A Companion to Philosophical Logic. Malden, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 531–544.
Polish Logic.Jan Woleński - 2004 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 12 (5):399-428.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
29 (#767,834)

6 months
10 (#388,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pavel Janda
Uniwersytetu Gdanskiego

Citations of this work

Formal Epistemology Meets Mechanism Design.Jürgen Landes - 2023 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 54 (2):215-231.

Add more citations