Definitions and Counter-Examples

Philosophy 62 (240):179 - 193 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his paper ‘A Function for Thought Experiments’, T. S. Kuhn asks: Ought we demand of our concepts, as we do of our laws and theories, that they be applicable to any and every situation that might conceivably arise in any possible world? Is it not sufficient to demand of a concept, as we do of a law or theory, that it be unequivocally applicable in every situation which we expect ever to encounter?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Differences between Logical Demonstration and Logical Argumentation in the Text.Olda Balliu - 2018 - Annals of Philosophy, Social and Human Disciplines 2.
Kant's Ethical Formalism.O. C. Jensen - 1934 - Philosophy 9 (34):195 - 208.
Gestalt Psychology.Maxwell Garnett - 1943 - Philosophy 18 (69):37 - 49.
Distances between formal theories.Michele Friend, Mohamed Khaled, Koen Lefever & Gergely Székely - unknown - Review of Symbolic Logic 13 (3):633-654.
Acting According to Conscience.Desmond M. Clarke - 1987 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 22:135-149.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
51 (#430,704)

6 months
8 (#603,286)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?