Universal moral grammar: a critical appraisal

Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (9):373-378 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A new framework for the study of the human moral faculty is currently receiving much attention: the so-called ‘universal moral grammar' framework. It is based on an intriguing analogy, first pointed out by Rawls, between the study of the human moral sense and Chomsky's research program into the human language faculty. In order to assess UMG, we ask: is moral competence modular? Does it have an underlying hierarchical grammatical structure? Does moral diversity rest on culture-dependent parameters? We review evidence that supports negative answers and argue that formal grammatical concepts are of limited value for the study of moral judgments, moral development and moral diversity

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
167 (#144,110)

6 months
9 (#328,796)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pierre Jacob
Institut Jean Nicod