Response to “The Mysterious Disappearance of the Object of Inquiry: Jacobs and Arora's Defense of Circumcision”

American Journal of Bioethics 15 (8):4-5 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sex and Circumcision.Brian D. Earp - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2):43-45.
The Tolerance of Ritual Male Infant Circumcision.Gregory L. Bock - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2):48-49.
The Jacobs Parental Prerogative Test.Barry Lyons & Ralph Hurley O’Dwyer - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2):52-53.
Reply to Jacobs.Glen I. Spielmans & Peter I. Parry - 2010 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (3):289-290.
Andrew S. Jacobs.Small Sacrifices - 2011 - In Jennifer Wright Knust & Zsuzsanna Várhelyi (eds.), Ancient Mediterranean Sacrifice. Oup Usa. pp. 251.
In Defense of Jane Jacobs.Anthony Cichello - 1989 - Lonergan Workshop 7 (9999):99-168.
J. Jacobs, Dimensions Of Moral Therory.Vasil Gluchman - 2005 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 12 (2):227-233.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-31

Downloads
58 (#370,883)

6 months
14 (#233,812)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ritual Male Infant Circumcision and Human Rights.Allan J. Jacobs & Kavita Shah Arora - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2):30-39.

Add more references