Introduction1

Hypatia 15 (4):221-223 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I analyze the relationship between women and nationalism and argue that women's "identity" and relationship to the "Other" is different from that of men, because within the nation women, though included, are so as subordinate to men. I argue, further, that the structures of nationalism are fundamentally homosocial, and antagonism toward women is one of the first forms of attack on the "Other" (including of course towards women of one's own nation). It is constitutive of "extreme nationalism" and is, as subordinate inclusion, the pattern of other excusions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction1.Timothy J. White - 2005 - The European Legacy 10 (1):1-3.
I. Introduction1.Th Grivet - 1967 - Dialectica 21 (1‐4):10-13.
Is Globalization Good for Women?Alison M. Jaggar - 2001 - Comparative Literature 53 (4):298-314.
Ontologically Grounded Subordination.Adam Omelianchuk - 2011 - Philosophia Christi 13 (1):169-180.
Cricket Versus Republicanism.D. C. Stove - 1995 - Sydney, Australia: Quakers Hill Press.
Real men.Hugh LaFollette - 1992 - In Larry May & Robert Strikwerda (eds.), Rethinking Masculinity: Philosophical Explorations in Light of Feminism. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 59--74.
The Intellectual Capacity of Women.David Stove - 1990 - Proceedings of the Russellian Society 15:1-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
152 (#150,105)

6 months
28 (#120,102)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references