Contemporary global challenges and ethical mindsets

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 18 (2):183-196 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to provide a framework that might be used to tackle the multifaceted challenges facing humanity, which are increasing in seriousness and complexity. The Millennium Project had identified such challenges, and over time periods until and including 2050, which pose the question, how would societies cope with these challenges averting any disastrous results? contemplating the suggested ethical principles, and the three central beliefs of “end-based”, “rule-based” and “care-based”. In some cases, individuals might not be blamed to think that “it is only a miracle” that might save humanity. Design/methodology/approach This paper, through the use of literature review, intends to provide an insight into these challenges, the suggested ethical principles and the three central beliefs, providing brief overview of the concept “miracle” leading to discussion on ethical mindsets, its components and their dimensions. Findings Concluding with framework for the way forward tackling these challenges. Research limitations/implications The limitation of this paper might lie in the fact that it is only a conceptual paper, but it calls on researchers to conduct further research using the suggested framework. Originality/value This might seem to be forward thinking, but it is a call for researchers to conduct more research in this area, and for governments to fund such research, to allow for the establishment of a method to refine the mindsets of individuals around the world to change into “ethical”, and thus, the world becomes better equipped to face and reduce the challenges and threats that are being faced by the world.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,859

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The state of the responsible research and innovation programme.George Inyila Ogoh & N. Ben Fairweather - 2019 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 17 (2):145-166.
Challenges to ethical publishing in the digital era.Mirjam Jessica Curno - 2016 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 14 (1):4-15.
3D online environments: ethical challenges for marketing research.Ioannis Krasonikolakis & Nancy Pouloudi - 2015 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 13 (3/4):218-234.
On the complexities of studying sensitive communities online as a researcher–participant.Ylva Hård af Segerstad - 2021 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 19 (3):409-423.
The ethics pipeline to academic publishing.Tricia Bertram Gallant - 2016 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 14 (1):24-28.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-24

Downloads
22 (#1,069,994)

6 months
9 (#444,932)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Eucharist: metaphysical miracle or institutional fact?H. E. Baber - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (3):333-352.
Spinoza on Biblical Miracles.Warren Zev Harvey - 2013 - Journal of the History of Ideas 74 (4):659-675.

Add more references