Defining Art and its Future

Journal of Arts and Humanities 6 (6):84-94 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Art is a creative phenomenon which changes constantly, not just insofar as it is being created continually, but also in the very meaning of ‘art.’ Finding a suitable definition of art is no easy task and it has been the subject of much inquiry throughout artistic expression. This paper suggests a crucial distinction between ‘art forms’ and ‘forms of art’ is necessary in order to better understand art. The latter of these corresponds to that which we would typically call art such as painting, singing, etc. The former corresponds to the form out of which these take shape, movement, speech, etc. With this distinction set out, it becomes clearer that art and the aesthetic is rooted in the properties of the ‘thing’ such as the color, shape, and the texture, rather than the product of creation itself. Thus, the future of art will bring a new aesthetic in which these properties become recognized as art and as such there will be an aesthetic of everyday life.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-10

Downloads
961 (#22,589)

6 months
160 (#25,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Zachary Isrow
Beacon College

References found in this work

Art and the aesthetic: an institutional analysis.George Dickie - 1974 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
An Essay on Liberation.Herbert Marcuse - 1969 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 26 (1):122-126.
Nobody Needs a Theory of Art.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy 105 (3):109-127.

View all 15 references / Add more references