A note on the independence of premiss rule

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 62 (1-2):72-76 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this note, we prove that certain theories of (many‐sorted) intuitionistic predicate logic are closed under the independence of premiss rule (IPR). As corollaries, we show that and extended by some non‐classical axioms and non‐constructive axioms are closed under IPR.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,733

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the independence of premiss axiom and rule.Hajime Ishihara & Takako Nemoto - 2020 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 59 (7-8):793-815.
Markov's Rule revisited.Daniel Leivant - 1990 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 30 (2):125-127.
The Friedman‐Translation for Martin‐Löf's Type Theory.Erik Palmgren - 1995 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 41 (3):314-326.
Classically archetypal rules.Tomasz Połacik & Lloyd Humberstone - 2018 - Review of Symbolic Logic 11 (2):279-294.
An Intuitionistic Axiomatisation of Real Closed Fields.Erik Palmgren - 2002 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 48 (2):297-299.
Completeness and incompleteness for intuitionistic logic.Charles Mccarty - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (4):1315-1327.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
41 (#540,991)

6 months
4 (#1,238,277)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Syntactic translations and provably recursive functions.Daniel Leivant - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (3):682-688.
Some principles weaker than Markov’s principle.Makoto Fujiwara, Hajime Ishihara & Takako Nemoto - 2015 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 54 (7-8):861-870.
A Note on the Godel-Gentzen Translation.Hajime Ishihara - 2000 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 46 (1):135-138.

Add more references