Point and counterpoint: Should the ethics committee visit the patient? No: Hec members should not visit the patient [Book Review]

HEC Forum 3 (1):19-22 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,859

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Point and counterpoint. Should healthcare ethics committee members be paid?J. M. Cain & J. E. Reagan - 1992 - Hec Forum: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Hospitals' Ethical and Legal Issues 4 (6):378.
Point and counterpoint: is it beneficial for ethics committee functions to be mandated in statutes and/or regulations?B. D. Reeves & H. Brody - 1992 - Hec Forum: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Hospitals' Ethical and Legal Issues 4 (54):324.
Point and counterpoint. Should HECs provide advice counter to the law when they believe it inappropriate?Robert D. Orr & D. Mathieu - 1991 - Hec Forum: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Hospitals' Ethical and Legal Issues 3 (3):167.
Point and counterpoint. Should HECs consider financial costs of care during case review?Evelyn J. van Allen & K. Iserson - 1992 - Hec Forum: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Hospitals' Ethical and Legal Issues 4 (1):51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
50 (#485,055)

6 months
19 (#161,182)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?