- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Useful knowledge, social agency, and legitimation 'Useful'knowledge in this context means valid and socially legitimate, as well as being of more immediate practical relevance and use. It is often found that expert
In Alan Irwin & Brian Wynne, Misunderstanding science?: the public reconstruction of science and technology. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 213 (1996)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Alan Irwin and Brian Wynne, Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology.[author unknown] - 1998 - Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 51 (4):552-553.
Book Reviews : Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, edited by Alan Irwin and Brian Wynne. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 232 pp. £35.00. [REVIEW]Michael Mulkay - 1997 - Science, Technology and Human Values 22 (2):254-258.
Alan Irwin and Brian Wynne , Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. Pp. vii+229. ISBN 0-521-43268-5. £35.00, $59.95. [REVIEW]John Pickstone - 1998 - British Journal for the History of Science 31 (1):63-102.
Understanding of Hazard issues.Alan Irwin Alison Dale & Denis Smith - 1996 - In Alan Irwin & Brian Wynne, Misunderstanding science?: the public reconstruction of science and technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Misunderstanding science?: the public reconstruction of science and technology.Alan Irwin & Brian Wynne (eds.) - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Broadening the scope of our understanding of mechanisms: lessons from the history of the morning-after pill.Christopher ChoGlueck - 2021 - Synthese 198 (3):2223-2252.
Scientific Consensus and Expert Testimony in Courts: Lessons from the Bendectin Litigation.Boaz Miller - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (1):15-33.
A Democracy Paradox in Studies of Science and Technology.Silke Beck, Roger Pielke & Eva Lövbrand - 2011 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 36 (4):474-496.
AI and representation: A study of a rhetorical context for legitimacy. [REVIEW]Lynette A. C. Hunter - 1993 - AI and Society 7 (3):185-207.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-28
Downloads
27 (#864,536)
6 months
1 (#1,572,794)
2014-01-28
Downloads
27 (#864,536)
6 months
1 (#1,572,794)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
A Cultural Political Economy of Research and Innovation in an Age of Crisis.David Tyfield - 2012 - Minerva 50 (2):149-167.
Revisiting “Upstream Public Engagement”: from a Habermasian Perspective.Xi Wang - 2016 - NanoEthics 10 (1):63-74.
Ethics Inside the Black Box: Integrating Science and Technology Studies into Engineering and Public Policy Curricula.Christopher Lawrence, Sheila Jasanoff, Sam Weiss Evans, Keith Raffel & L. Mahadevan - 2023 - Science and Engineering Ethics 29 (4):1-31.
Ethical Advice to Policy in its Problematic Context: Expertise and Trust.Deborah Oughton & Ellen-Marie Forsberg - 2004 - Global Bioethics 17 (1):173-180.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-s277s uwo