Hintikka formulas as axioms of refutation calculus, a case study

Bulletin of the Section of Logic 24 (2) (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the atomic formula property of Hartig's refutation calculus.Takao Inoué - 1994 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 23 (4).
D-complete axioms for the classical equivalential calculus.Dolph Ulrich - 2005 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 34 (3):135-142.
Slupecki's fragmentary systems.Grzegorz Bryll & Katarzyna Halkowska - 1984 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 13 (4):252-254.
A note on the Lambek-van Benthem calculus.Wojciech Buszkowski - 1984 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 13 (1):31-35.
Ene-logics.Waclawa Kielak - 1976 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 5 (3):84-86.
The logic B and the reductio axioms.Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez - 2004 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 33 (2):87-94.
On probability measures for deductive systems III.David Miller - 1978 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 7 (2):51-55.
Subframe formulas for s4-type intuitionistic modal logic.Kazuyo Inoi - 2001 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 30 (2):99-105.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references