- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
McMahan on the withdrawal of life‐prolonging aid
Philosophical Books 46 (1):11-22 (2005)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral EnhancementBy Ingmar Persson And Julian Savulescu.Richard Joyce - 2013 - Analysis 73 (3):587-589.
Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement, written by Ingmar Persson and Julian Savulescu.Melinda A. Roberts - 2016 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (6):751-754.
PERSSON, INGMAR; SAVULESCU, JULIAN, ¿Preparados para el futuro? La necesidad del mejoramiento moral, TEELL Editorial S.L., 2020, 189 pp. [REVIEW]Javier Cabaleiro-Díaz - 2020 - Anuario Filosófico 53 (2):387-390.
Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement, by Persson, Ingmar, and Julian Savulescu: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. ix + 143, £21.00. [REVIEW]Robert Sparrow - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (2):404-407.
Book Review: Julian Savulescu, Ingmar Persson, Unfit for the Future. The Need for Moral Enhancement, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012; Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu et al. (a cura di), The Ethics of Human Enhancement. Understanding the Debate, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016. [REVIEW]Luca Lo Sapio - 2017 - Scienza E Filosofia 17:275–290.
On Harming and killing: Replies to Hanser, Persson and Savulescu, and Wasserman.Jeff Mcmanah - 2005 - Philosophical Books 46 (1):34-44.
Moral bioenhancement and agential risks: Good and bad outcomes.Phil Torres - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (9):691-696.
On Harming and killing: Replies to Hanser, Persson and Savulescu, and Wasserman.Jeff McMahon - manuscript
Moral Bioenhancement and Free Will: Continuing the Debate.Vojin Rakić - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (3):384-393.
The perils of failing to enhance: a response to Persson and Savulescu.E. Fenton - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (3):148-151.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-10
Downloads
52 (#419,921)
6 months
9 (#495,347)
2010-08-10
Downloads
52 (#419,921)
6 months
9 (#495,347)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Abortion, infanticide and allowing babies to die, 40 years on.Julian Savulescu - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):257-259.
Withdrawal Aversion as a Useful Heuristic for Critical Care Decisions.Piotr Grzegorz Nowak & Tomasz Żuradzki - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):36-38.
Ethical Withdrawal of ECMO Support Over the Objections of Competent Patients.Dominic Wilkinson, John Fraser, Jacky Suen, Mioko Kasagi Suzuki & Julian Savulescu - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):27-30.
Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment and the Relevance of the Killing Versus Letting Die Distinction.Robert D. Truog & Andrew McGee - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):34-36.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-2w72m uwo