- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Book Review: Science of Science and Reflexivity [Book Review]
European Journal of Social Theory 8 (3):375-379 (2005)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Book Review: Science of Science and Reflexivity. [REVIEW]Theodore Schatzki - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (4):496-499.
Book review: Social Science at the Crossroads. [REVIEW]Peter Wagner - 2021 - European Journal of Social Theory 24 (3):431-434.
Postscript : Reflexivity and Social Science.Terry Evens - 2016 - In T. M. S. Evens, Don Handelman & Christopher Roberts (eds.), Reflecting on reflexivity: the human condition as an ontological surprise. New York: Berghahn.
Book review: Time, Science and the Critique of Technological Reason: Essays in Honor of Hermínio Martins. [REVIEW]Bryan S. Turner - 2019 - European Journal of Social Theory 22 (4):571-574.
Social science and social theory.Patrick Baert - 2006 - In Gerard Delanty (ed.), The handbook of contemporary European social theory. New York: Routledge. pp. 14--24.
Meanings of life in contemporary Ireland: webs of significance.Tom Inglis - 2014 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Reflexivity and its Consequences.Johan Heilbron - 1999 - European Journal of Social Theory 2 (3):298-306.
Philosophical Reflexivity in Psychological Science: Do We Have It? Does It Matter?Kathleen Slaney, Donna Tafreshi & Charlie A. Wu - 2019 - In Kieran C. O'Doherty, Lisa M. Osbeck, Ernst Schraube & Jeffery Yen (eds.), Psychological Studies of Science and Technology. Springer Verlag. pp. 237-256.
Reflexivity and modesty in the application of complexity theory.Roger Strand & Silvia Canellas-Bolta - 2006 - In Ângela Guimarães Pereira, Sofia Guedes Vaz & Sylvia S. Tognetti (eds.), Interfaces between science and society. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.
A social science research agenda.Robert Fine - 2006 - In Gerard Delanty (ed.), The handbook of contemporary European social theory. New York: Routledge. pp. 242.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-11-25
Downloads
13 (#1,326,944)
6 months
4 (#1,258,347)
2020-11-25
Downloads
13 (#1,326,944)
6 months
4 (#1,258,347)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Significance of Scientific Capital in UK Medical Education.Caragh Brosnan - 2011 - Minerva 49 (3):317-332.
NORMATİF BİLİMİN İMKÂNLARI.Abdulkadir Öncel, Özlem Kuyu & Ramazan Ertel - 2020 - Özne Felsefe Dergisi 1 (33):85-110.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-82spv uwo