Immediate awareness

Dialogue 8 (2):228-42 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to show that we should dispense with the concept of immediate awareness, when it takes for its object the existence and nature of our sensations and images.The question of whether we are immediately aware of the existence and nature of our sensations and images cannot be answered in a reasonable manner unless we have a firm grip on the concept of immediate awareness. Philosophers who have employed it have usually employed it in such a way that the word “immediate” in the corresponding phrase “immediate awareness” describes both the nature of the awareness and how it came to have that nature. When it describes the nature of the awareness “immediate” means “incorrigible”.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,957

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intrinsic theory and the content of inner awareness.Uriah Kriegel - 2003 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 24 (2):169-196.
Atemporality and the mode of divine knowledge.Gregory Ganssle - 1993 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 34 (3):171 - 180.
Action-Awareness and the Active Mind.Peter Carruthers - 2009 - Philosophical Papers 38 (2):133-156.
Causation in commonsense realism.Johannes Roessler - 2011 - In Johannes Roessler, Hemdat Lerman & Naomi Eilan, Perception, Causation, and Objectivity. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The sciousness hypothesis: Part I.Thomas Natsoulas - 1996 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 17 (1):45-66.
The Sciousness Hypothesis — Part II.Thomas Natsoulas - 1996 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 17 (2):185-206.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#607,366)

6 months
9 (#451,975)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Imlay
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

Is there a good argument against the incorrigibility thesis?Frank Jackson - 1973 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (1):51-62.
Jackson on incorrigibility.Frank G. Verges - 1974 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 52 (3):243-50.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Are phenomenal reports absolutely certain?Hans Reichenbach - 1952 - Philosophical Review 61 (April):147-159.
Philosophical Essays.[author unknown] - 1957 - Philosophy 32 (120):67-70.

Add more references