Is It Possible to Observe Society in Its Totality? Niklas Luhmann as Perseus and Medusa as Society

Sociology of Power 36 (4):207-217 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article raises the question of the theoretical and cognitive foundations of sociological observation in the system-communication theory of Niklas Luhmann. Observation of society in its entirety is possible only from within itself, and therefore its observer (sociologist, artist, writer, moralist, politician or participant in a social movement) is necessarily included in the observed object itself. This circumstance gives rise to the paradox of self-applicability or self-reference in their social specification, since generalizing statements about society, if they claim to be universal in description, are always applicable to the statements themselves. It is substantiated that the paradoxes of self- applicability and self-reference, without receiving their resolution, are never- theless performatively realized both in social reality itself and in its theoretical representation, and ensure the function of the social system — reflection of the system and the possibility of comparing one’s own observation resources with the methods of observation of adjacent communication systems. Following logic of self-observation, social theory is supplemented by a self-referential theoretical complex (sub-discipline), called “Self-Descriptions” (the fifth book of N. Luhmann’s fundamental work “Societies of Society”). This additional theory specializes in reconstructing the semantics of the concept of society, how society — in its communications, religion, mass media, art, politics, but today primarily in the optics of science — looked and looks at itself. Such inclu- sion of “Self-Description” (“shorthand”, “scene description”) in the corpus of social theory, as its integral and equal part with the function of describing the formation, semantics and theoretical resources of the theory of society itself, has become an important theoretical innovation in the field of social theory.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does Systems Differentiation Present a Risk for Contemporary Society?Jiří Šubrt - 2009 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 31 (2):25-39.
Autopoietic System.Jan Overwijk - 2019 - Philosophy Today 63 (4):1125-1137.
Niklas Luhmann: The Reconstruction of Modernity.Sabine Geppert - 2000 - Dissertation, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick
Niklas Luhmann and the Body.Francis Halsall - 2012 - The New Bioethics 18 (1):4-20.
Niklas Luhmann, Carl Schmitt and the Modern Form of the Political.Chris Thornhill - 2007 - European Journal of Social Theory 10 (4):499-522.
Art as an Autopoietic Sub-System of Modern Society.Erkki Sevänen - 2001 - Theory, Culture and Society 18 (1):75-103.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-01-09

Downloads
1 (#1,944,679)

6 months
1 (#1,886,949)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Philosophy of Logical Atomism.Bertrand Russell - 1919 - The Monist 29 (1):32-63.

Add more references