Why Numbers Count – Nonconsequentialism and Intrapersonal Aggregation

SATS 13 (1):60-74 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/sats-2012-0004

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,302

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Aggregation, Balancing, and Respect for the Claims of Individuals.Bastian Steuwer - 2021 - Utilitas 33 (1):17-34.
Taurek on Numbers don't Count.Ben Saunders - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone, Just the Arguments. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 249–250.
The Numbers Count.Peter A. Graham - 2017 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):129-134.
Why the Numbers Count.L. W. Sumner - 1996 - Dialogue 35 (2):375-386.
Individualist Theories and Interpersonal Aggregation.Erik Zhang - 2024 - Ethics 134 (4):479-511.
Limitarismo presuntivo. Una respuesta a Robert Huseby.Dick Timmer - 2024 - In Ingrid Robeyns, Tener Demasiado: Ensayos Filosóficos sobre el Limitarismo. Open Book Publishers. pp. 227–244. Translated by Héctor Iñaki Larrínaga Márquez.
Why the numbers count.James F. Woodward - 1981 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 19 (4):531-540.
What is ethics?James P. Sterba - 2019 - Medford, MA: Polity.
The Numbers Always Count.John Halstead - 2016 - Ethics 126 (3):789-802.
Why ‘‘Water’’ is Nearly an Indexical.J. P. Smit - 2010 - SATS 11 (1):33-51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
61 (#363,736)

6 months
9 (#328,796)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references