- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Philosophy of criminal law
Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield (1987)
Abstract
This volume collects 17 of Douglas Husak's influential essays in criminal law theory. The essays span Husak's original and provocative contributions to the central topics in the field, including the grounds of criminal liability, relative culpability, the role of defences, and the justification of punishment. The volume includes an extended introduction by the author, drawing together the themes of his work, and exploring the goals of criminal theoryAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of Douglas Husak, Philosophy of Criminal Law: Selected Essays. [REVIEW]Andrew Botterell - 2013 - University of Toronto Law Journal 63 (1):152-158.
What is Philosophy of Criminal Law?: John Deigh and David Dolinko: The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Criminal Law.Youngjae Lee - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (3):671-685.
The New Philosophy of Criminal Law.Chad Flanders & Zachary Hoskins (eds.) - 2015 - London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield International.
The philosophy of criminal law: selected essays.Douglas N. Husak - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Offences and defences: selected essays in the philosophy of criminal law.John Gardner - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Douglas Husak , The Philosophy of Criminal Law . Reviewed by.Roger Shiner - 2012 - Philosophy in Review 32 (1):30-32.
The Philosophy of Criminal Law: Extending the Debates. [REVIEW]Douglas Husak - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):351-365.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
87 (#240,359)
6 months
11 (#337,502)
2009-01-28
Downloads
87 (#240,359)
6 months
11 (#337,502)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A Primer on the distinction between justification and excuse.Andrew Botterell - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):172-196.
From Neuroscience to Law: Bridging the Gap.Tuomas K. Pernu & Nadine Elzein - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
‘O Call Me Not to Justify the Wrong’: Criminal Answerability and the Offence/Defence Distinction.Luís Duarte D’Almeida - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):227-245.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-ksrwm uwo