Organisms: Between a Kantian Approach and a Liberal Approach

In Matteo Mossio (ed.), Organization in Biology. Springer. pp. 127-157 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concept of “organism” has been central to modern biology, with its definition and philosophical implications evolving since the nineteenth century. In contemporary biology, the divide between developmental and physiological approaches and evolutionary approaches has influenced the definition of organism. The convergence between molecular biology and evolutionary biology has led to the term “suborganismal biology,” while the return to the organism has been characterized by animal behavior studies and Evo-devo. The philosophical approach to the concept of individual is divided between a Kantian understanding of organism, which defines necessary and sufficient conditions for any X to be a “natural purpose,” and an evolutionary approach, which considers what a biological individual is and confers natural selection a key role in this definition. While the former aims to find necessary and sufficient conditions for an organism, the latter thinks in terms of conceptual spaces, being much more liberal in pointing out organisms in the world. The paper examines possible connections between these two approaches and assesses the prospects of a reconciliation between them.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Biological organisms or Darwinian individuals?José Tomás Alvarado - 2024 - Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso 27:1-18.
What is an organism? An immunological answer.Thomas Pradeu - 2010 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 32 (2-3):247-267.
The organism as ontological go-between. Hybridity, boundaries and degrees of reality in its conceptual history.Charles T. Wolfe - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 1:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shps.
The Mastodon in the room: how Darwinian is neo-Darwinism?Daniel R. Brooks - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (1):82-88.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-11

Downloads
9 (#1,522,540)

6 months
1 (#1,886,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philippe Huneman
University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references