New Challenges to New Science

Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):26-28 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Second-Order Science: Logic, Strategies, Methods” by Stuart A. Umpleby. Upshot: The humanities are gaining a new self-awareness of the role of observers who develop theories, and of the interplays between the theories and the system being studied. This article follows up the target paper with extended challenging questions, inviting more discussion

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Do We Need a Second-Order Science?M. A. Notturno - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):23-26.
Observer Effects in Research.M. C. Bateson - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):31-32.
Do We also Need Second-order Mathematics?J. P. Van Bendegem - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):34-35.
The Promise and Prospects of Second-Order Science.D. Rousseau - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):37-38.
Science Is not Value-free.J. Stewart - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):28-29.
Second-Order Science is Enacted Constructivism.M. R. Lissack - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):35-37.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-15

Downloads
10 (#1,466,946)

6 months
10 (#398,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references