The society of selves

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 362 (1480):745-754 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Human beings are not only the most sociable animals on Earth, but also the only animals that have to ponder the separateness that comes with having a conscious self. The philosophical problem of ‘other minds’ nags away at people’s sense of who—and why—they are. But the privacy of consciousness has an evolutionary history—and maybe even an evolutionary function. While recognizing the importance to humans of mind-reading and psychic transparency, we should consider the consequences and possible benefits of being—ultimately—psychically opaque

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant and Moral Responsibility for Animals.Helga Varden - 2020 - In John J. Callanan & Lucy Allais (eds.), Kant and Animals. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press. pp. 157-175.
Single units and conscious vision.Nikos K. Logothetis - 1998 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 353:1801-1818.
Imitation as an inheritance system.Nicholas Shea - 2009 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364:2429-2443.
Automata, receptacles, and selves.Paola Cavalieri & Harlan B. Miller - 1999 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 5.
Is there a human nature?Mikael Stenmark - 2012 - Zygon 47 (4):890-902.
Facing Up to the Hard Question of Consciousness.Daniel C. Dennett - 2018 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 373.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
83 (#252,411)

6 months
6 (#858,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?