Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):453-476 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Category-specific impairments of object recognition and naming are among the most intriguing disorders in neuropsychology, affecting the retrieval of knowledge about either living or nonliving things. They can give us insight into the nature of our representations of objects: Have we evolved different neural systems for recognizing different categories of object? What kinds of knowledge are important for recognizing particular objects? How does visual similarity within a category influence object recognition and representation? What is the nature of our semantic knowledge about different objects? We review the evidence on category-specific impairments, arguing that deficits even for one class of object cannot be accounted for in terms of a single information processing disorder across all patients; problems arise at contrasting loci in different patients. The same apparent pattern of impairment can be produced by damage to different loci. According to a new processing framework for object recognition and naming, the hierarchical interactive theory, we have a hierarchy of highly interactive stored representations. HIT explains the variety of patients in terms of lesions at different levels of processing and different forms of stored knowledge used both for particular tasks and for particular categories of object. Key Words: category-specific deficits; functional imaging; hierarchical models; interactive activation models; neuropsychology; object recognition; perceptual and functional knowledge

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Category specificity in mind and brain?Glyn W. Humphreys & Emer M. E. Forde - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):497-504.
On disentangling and weighting kinds of semantic knowledge.Agnesa Pillon & Dana Samson - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):490-490.
Beyond the sensory/functional dichotomy.George S. Cree & Ken McRae - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):480-481.
Category-specific deficits and exemplar models.Koen Lamberts - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):484-485.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
97 (#215,063)

6 months
12 (#277,938)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?