The Politics of Quantified Relationships

American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):29-30 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2017.1409831

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Love in the Time of Quantified Relationships.Eric S. Swirsky & Andrew D. Boyd - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):35-37.
Algorithmic Bloodhounds.Evan Selinger & Brett Frischmann - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):24-26.
The Quantified Relationship.John Danaher, Sven Nyholm & Brian D. Earp - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):3-19.
Relational Autonomy and the Quantified Relationship.Hannah Martens & Timothy Emmanuel Brown - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):39-40.
Swiping Left on the Quantified Relationship: Exploring the Potential Soft Impacts.Lily Frank & Michał Klincewicz - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):27-28.
Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnologies and Quantified Relationship Technologies: Overlapping Ethical Concerns.Sven Nyholm, Brian D. Earp & John Danaher - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (4):167-170.
Review of Wanda Teays, John-Stewart Gordon, and Alison Dundes Renteln, eds., Global Bioethics and Human Rights: Contemporary Issues. [REVIEW]Matthew DeCamp - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2):3-4.
Review of Marion Danis, Emily Largent, David Wendler, Sara Chandros Hull, Seema Shah, Joseph Millum, Benjamin Berkman, and Christine Grady, Research Ethics Consultation: A Casebook1. [REVIEW]Emily E. Anderson - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):54-55.
The Benefits and Risks of Quantified Relationship Technologies: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Quantified Relationship”.John Danaher, Sven Nyholm & Brian D. Earp - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):3-6.
Certain relationships between stimulus intensity and stimulus generalization.William Heyman - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (4):239.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-04

Downloads
41 (#550,031)

6 months
9 (#500,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gordon Hull
University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Quantified Relationship.John Danaher, Sven Nyholm & Brian D. Earp - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):3-19.

Add more references