Offices and God

Sophia 29 (3):29-34 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pavel Tichy presents an interpretation of Anselm’s Proslogion III argument. Tichy presents an interpretation of this argument and raises doubts about one of the premises. The authors contend that Tichy’s interpretation of Anselm is wrong. The argument Tichy comes to raise doubts about is not Anselm’s.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Offices and God.Philip Hugly & Charles Saywood - 1990 - Sophia 29 (3):29-34.
Pavel Tichý, léta v emigraci 1969-1994.Jindra TichÁ - 2002 - Filosoficky Casopis 50:808-809.
The legacy of Pavel Tichy.P. Materna - 2002 - Filosoficky Casopis 50 (5):803-807.
Pavel Tichý.Graham Oddie - 2010 - A Companion to Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand.
The Ontological Argument and Objects of Thought.Edward Wierenga - 2011 - Philosophic Exchange 42 (1):82-103.
Anselm's "Proslogion" Argument: A Metaphysics of Creation.Floyd Edwin Wike - 1980 - Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University
Pavel Tichý: O čem mluvíme?Pavel Cmorej - 1997 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 4 (2):208-213.
Pavel Tichy and Theory of Deduction.Karel Sebela - 2013 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20:66-74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-28

Downloads
387 (#73,081)

6 months
95 (#64,966)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Philip Hugly
University of California, Berkeley (PhD)
Charles Sayward
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references