Null Sentences

Iyyun, The Jewish Philosophical Quarterly 48:23-36 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Tractatus, Wittgenstein held that there are null sentences – prominently including logical truths and the truths of mathematics. He says that such sentences are without sense (sinnlos), that they say nothing; he also denies that they are nonsensical (unsinning). Surely it is what a sentence says which is true or false. So if a sentence says nothing, how can it be true or false? The paper discusses the issue.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Gödel Sentences and What They Say.Peter Milne - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 15 (2):193-226.
Sentence and Truth Value.Chai-Hsun Chuang - 2006 - Philosophy and Culture 33 (6):67-77.
Truthmaker Gaps and the No-No Paradox.Patrick Greenough - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (3):547 - 563.
The trouble with Tarski.Jonathan Harrison - 1998 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (190):1-22.
Lockean and logical truth conditions.J. Dreier - 2004 - Analysis 64 (1):84-91.
Vérifacteurs.Kevin Mulligan, Peter Simons & Barry Smith - 2008-2011 - Etudes de Philosophie 9:104-138.
Bipolarity and Sense in the Tractatus.Peter Hanks - 2014 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 2 (9).

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-28

Downloads
933 (#25,793)

6 months
114 (#55,060)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Philip Hugly
University of California, Berkeley (PhD)
Charles Sayward
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references