Art, beauty, and pornography: a journey through American culture

Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When viewing the picture of a beautiful sunset, how many of us realize that, while we admire it as a work of art, we have just taken the very first step toward pornography? And that both the beauty in the sunset and the senses that recognize such beauty are very likely to be anti-art? Making a radical departure from the conventional wisdom on art and beauty, ART, BEAUTY, AND PORNOGRAPHY presents the startling thesis that things of beauty are not only unrelated to art but often responsible for pornography. How is this possible? In this controversial work, Huer argues that beauty pleases the senses, which demand to be pleased with each new stimulation. In a society whose members put a premium on pleasurable things, it is natural that the visual medium occupies a commanding position among forms of cultural expression. In the process of competing to please the human eye, American society (the most graphic and visual civilization to date) concentrates on objects and events that please consumers and, by doing so, sell products. Much of this sense-pleasing business takes place in the name of art. But those senses pleased by what is beautiful are the same senses that receive gratification from the pornographic. Art has no place in this process. Based on these arguments, Huer makes a strong case for re-orienting the purpose of art. Drawing on historical experience in the West, he defines art as a statement about life: pain, wisdom, and happiness embodied in the life process. The artist is a teacher of life, the artwork his philosophy, and the art public the beneficiaries of his teaching. Neither beauty nor sensory pleasure, therefore, has anything to do with art. This important volume is, above all, a critique of contemporary American culture directed most especially to society's confusion about art, beauty, and pornography, and its willingness to allow business to assert dominion over artistic impulse. ART, BEAUTY, AND PORNOGRAPHY is a searing commentary on the follies of our time as well as an inspired defense of high art and the creative spirit.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Erotic Art.Hans Maes - 2014 - Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy.
Art, Beauty, and Pornography.Theodore A. Gracyk & Jon Huer - 1988 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 22 (2):121.
Why some pornography may be art.Mimi Vasilaki - 2010 - Philosophy and Literature 34 (1):pp. 228-233.
Beauty and art, 1750-2000.Elizabeth Prettejohn - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Beauty of Christian Art.Daniel Gustafsson - 2012 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 17 (2):175-196.
Art and Pornography: Philosophical Essays.Hans Maes & Jerrold Levinson (eds.) - 2012 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Beauty in nature, beauty in art.Christopher Janaway - 1993 - British Journal of Aesthetics 33 (4):321-332.
Why is Chu Kuang-Ch'ien's Aesthetic Thought Subjective Idealism?Ts'ai I. - 1975 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 6 (3):62-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
23 (#939,354)

6 months
1 (#1,886,937)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Drawing the Line: Art versus Pornography.Hans Maes - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (6):385-397.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references