Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Pitfalls of Deducing Ethics from Economics: Why the Association of American Medical Colleges is Wrong About Pharmaceutical Detailing”

American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):1-3 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

(2010). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Pitfalls of Deducing Ethics from Economics: Why the Association of American Medical Colleges is Wrong About Pharmaceutical Detailing”. The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. W1-W3

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265160903493088

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Details Are in the Field.Abraham P. Schwab - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):19-21.
The Pitfalls of Deducing Ethics From Behavioral Economics: Why the Association of American Medical Colleges Is Wrong About Pharmaceutical Detailing.Thomas S. Huddle - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):1-8.
Drug Detailers, Professionalism, and Prudence.Howard Brody - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):9-10.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Rationing Just Medical Care”.Lawrence J. Schneiderman - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):W1 - W3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ban the Sunset? Nonpropositional Content and Regulation of Pharmaceutical Advertising”.Paul Biegler & Patrick Vargas - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (5):W1-W5.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Can Medical Repatriation Be Ethical? Establishing Best Practices”.Mark Kuczewski - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (9):W1-W3.
Drug Detailing in Academic Medical Centers: Regulating for the Right Reasons, with the Right Evidence, at the Right Time.Michael Steinman & Dean Schillinger - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):21-23.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World”.Angela J. Ballantyne - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):4-6.
Etyczne uregulowania kontaktów studentów medycyny z firmami farmaceutycznymi w Stanach Zjednoczonych.Marta Makowska - 2014 - Annales. Ethics in Economic Life 17 (3):125-137.
An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”.Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
80 (#261,894)

6 months
9 (#485,111)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

All Gifts Large and Small.Dana Katz, Arthur L. Caplan & Jon F. Merz - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):39-46.
The limits of objective assessment of medical practice.Thomas S. Huddle - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (6):487-496.
The Devil in the Detail(ing).Haavi Morreim - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):15-17.

View all 12 references / Add more references