Has history refuted marxism?

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (2):180-198 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article considers the significance of the fall of communism for the question of the truth of Marxism. It begins by considering some Marxist theories of Stalinism and some Marxist criticisms of Bolshevism. Having rejected the adequacy of those theories, the author goes on to argue that while Stalinism in part rests on a nonmarket vision of socialism derived from Marx, contrary to an argument of Carl Cohen, this vision is not deeply rooted in Marxist philosophy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
31 (#736,320)

6 months
9 (#511,775)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Response to Richard Hudelson.Stephen Louw - 1997 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (2):209-211.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Is Karl Marx to Blame for "Barracks Socialism"?A. P. Butenko - 1990 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 29 (2):32-47.
The Sources of Stalinism.A. Tsipko - 1990 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 29 (2):6-31.

Add more references