No mirrors for the powerful: Why dominant smiles are not processed using embodied simulation

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (6):448-448 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A complete model of smile interpretation needs to incorporate its social context. We argue that embodied simulation is an unlikely route for understanding dominance smiles, which typically occur in the context of power. We support this argument by discussing the lack of eye contact with dominant faces and the facial and postural complementarity, rather than mimicry, that pervades hierarchical relationships

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What's embodied in a smile?Disa A. Sauter & Stephen C. Levinson - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (6):457-458.
Is eye contact the key to the social brain?Atsushi Senju & Mark H. Johnson - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (6):458-459.
Mimicry and simulation in gesture comprehension.Martha W. Alibali & Autumn B. Hostetter - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (6):433-434.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
47 (#462,611)

6 months
13 (#242,190)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The measurement of meaning.Charles Egerton Osgood - 1957 - Urbana,: University of Illinois Press. Edited by Donald C. Hildum.

Add more references