If Homosexuality Is Wrong, So Is Contraception

Philosophia Christi 23 (2):341-355 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Historically, the Christian church was united in firm opposition to both homosexuality and contraception. Today most evangelical Christians continue to oppose the former but have embraced the latter. This paper argues that there is a clear tension between these views, especially when it comes to the evangelical use of natural law–type reasoning. The conclusion of this paper is that Christians who view homosexual activity as immoral must also view artificial contraception in the same light. They are wrong for the same reason: they both misuse the sexual organs by directing sexual activity away from procreative unity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reconsidering the Contralife Argument and the Principle of Double Effect.Steven Dezort - 2022 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 22 (1):71-81.
Marriage and the Public Good.Rev Anthony E. Giampietro - 2007 - Christian Bioethics 13 (2):211-224.
Victims of Abortion and “Victims” of Contraception.Patrick A. Tully - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Research 30:383-398.
Reason, Faith and Homosexual Acts.John Finnis - 2001 - Catholic Social Science Review 6:61-69.
Marriage and the public good.Anthony E. Giampietro - 2007 - Christian Bioethics 13 (2):211-224.
The Body in Context: Sex and Catholicism.Gareth Moore - 1992 - Trinity Press International.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-22

Downloads
107 (#204,533)

6 months
16 (#159,027)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tim Hsiao
University of Arkansas Grantham

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references