Communicative Classification of Scientific Disciplines – pros and cons. Reply to Critics

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 62 (1):77-82 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Communicative Classification of Science.Евгений Валерьевич Масланов - 2025 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 62 (1):49-57.
Reply to Critics.Natalia I. Kuznetsova - 2024 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 61 (1):72-74.
Reply to Critics.Tatiana D. Sokolova - 2023 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 60 (2):72-74.
Reply to Critics.Alexander L. Nikiforov - 2015 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 46 (4):50-51.
Reply to critics.Alexander M. Dorozhkin - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 54 (4):47-48.
Reply to critics.Vadim Mezhuev - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):62-66.
Reply to Critics.Karen Momdzhyan - 2015 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 45 (3):45-53.
Reply to critics.В.М Межуев - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):62-66.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references