The convertibility of symbols: A reply to Goodman's critics

British Journal of Aesthetics 15 (3):207-216 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Goodman's rejection of resemblance.Craig Files - 1996 - British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (4):398-412.
Some remarks on Goodman's language theory of pictures.Jenefer Robinson - 1979 - British Journal of Aesthetics 19 (1):63-75.
"Art Worlds": Howard S. Becker. [REVIEW]T. J. Diffey - 1983 - British Journal of Aesthetics 23 (4):367.
Symbols, icons and stupas.Roy Perrett - 1996 - British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (4):432-438.
A Reply to my Critics.Klaus Hartmann - 1987 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 18 (2):189-191.
The stupa in indian art: Symbols and the symbolic.Jane Duran - 1996 - British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (1):66-74.
The Eloquence of Symbols: Studies in Humanist Art. [REVIEW]Ivan Gaskell - 1985 - British Journal of Aesthetics 25 (1):79-81.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
88 (#235,711)

6 months
11 (#322,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Are pictures unavoidably specific?Neil Mcdonell - 1983 - Synthese 57 (1):83 - 98.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references