Bringing Clarity to the Futility Debate: Don't Use the Wrong Cases

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (3):269-273 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Among those who criticize the concept of a common refrain is that we really have no idea what futility means. For example, physicians seem to disagree on whether a treatment being futile means that it has a less than 5% chance of working or a 20% chance of working. If the concept is so unclear, then it seems a thin reed upon which to base a momentous ethical decision—namely, that the physician's judgment should be allowed to override the wishes of the competent patient or the patient's duly appointed surrogate

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
61 (#347,941)

6 months
7 (#698,214)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?