More download options

Metadialogues: Krabbe’s Immanent Dialectic [Book Review]

Peter Houtlosser & Jan Albert van Laar

Argumentation 21 (3):205-208 (2007) Copy BIBT_EX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Cite

Plain text

BibTeX

Formatted text

Reference Manager

RefWorks

Options

Mark as duplicate

Find it on Scholar

Request removal from index

Revision history

Author's Profile

Jan Albert Van Laar

University of Groningen

Categories

Informal Logic in Logic and Philosophy of Logic

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10503-007-9053-z

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

Upload a copy of this work Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
Configure custom resolver

My notes

Sign in to use this feature

Similar books and articles

Commentary on Jan Albert van Laar and Erik C. W. Krabbe, “Splitting a Difference of Opinion”.David Godden - unknown

Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (Eds.) (2002). Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. [REVIEW]R. H. Johnson - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (4):483-488.

Review of van Eemeren & Houtlosser (2002): Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. [REVIEW]Alan G. Gross - 2003 - Pragmatics and Cognition 11 (2):386-390.

Countering Fallacious Moves.Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (3):243-252.

Special Issue on Strategic Maneuvering in Institutional Contexts Dedicated to Peter Houtlosser (1956–2008).Frans H. van Eemeren - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (3):305-315.

Review of: Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans: Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study: Springer: Dordrecht, 2007, ix, 234 pp. [REVIEW]Manfred Kienpointner - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):519-524.

No Place for Compromise: Resisting the Shift to Negotiation.David Godden & John Casey - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (4):499-535.

Choice is Not True or False: The Domain of Rhetorical Argumentation. [REVIEW]Christian Kock - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (1):61-80.

Commentary on van Eemeren & Houtlosser.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - unknown

Commentary on van Laar.J. Anthony Blair - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
23 (#939,354)

6 months
2 (#1,685,557)

Historical graph of downloads

How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jan Albert Van Laar

University of Groningen

Citations of this work

Galilean argumentation and the inauthenticity of the Cigoli letter on painting vs. sculpture.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):492-508.

Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.) - 2012 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning.Douglas Neil Walton & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1995 - Albany, NY, USA: State University of New York Press.

Fallacies.Charles Leonard Hamblin - 1970 - Newport News, Va.: Vale Press.

The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument.Douglas Walton - 1998 - University of Toronto Press.

Fallacies.C. L. Hamblin - 1970 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 160:492-492.

From axiom to dialogue: a philosophical study of logics and argumentation.E. M. Barth - 1982 - New York: W. de Gruyter. Edited by E. C. W. Krabbe.

View all 9 references / Add more references