Science Transformed? Debating Claims of an Epochal Break

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (2):228-231 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

We are not Witnesses to a New Scientific Revolution.Gregor Schiemann - 2011 - In Alfred Nordmann, Hans Radder & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), Science Transformed?: Debating Claims of an Epochal Break. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 31-42.
The Epochal Nature of Process in Whitehead’s Metaphysics. [REVIEW]Stephen David Ross - 1983 - International Studies in Philosophy 15 (3):118-120.
The science wars: Debating scientific knowledge and technology.Noretta Koertge - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):185-188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-14

Downloads
18 (#1,123,254)

6 months
8 (#613,944)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
We have never been modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
On Virtue Ethics.Rosalind Hursthouse - 1999 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.

View all 10 references / Add more references