Legal and Ethical Considerations in Allowing Parental Exemptions From Newborn Critical Congenital Heart Disease (CCHD) Screening

American Journal of Bioethics 16 (1):11-17 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Critical congenital heart disease screening is rapidly becoming the standard of care in the United States after being added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel in 2011. Newborn screens typically do not require affirmative parental consent. In fact, most states allow parents to exempt their baby from receiving the required screen on the basis of religious or personally held beliefs. There are many ethical considerations implicated with allowing parents to exempt their child from newborn screening for CCHD. Considerations include the treatment of religious exemptions in our current legal system, as well as medical and ethical principles in relation to the rights of infants. Although there are significant benefits to screening newborns for CCHD, when a parent refuses for religious or personal beliefs, in the case of CCHD screening, the parental decision should stand

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Religion and Newborn Screening.Richard H. Dees & Jennifer M. Kwon - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (1):20-21.
Parental Refusal of Newborn Screening for Congenital Hearing Loss.Danton Char - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (1):33-35.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-07

Downloads
86 (#241,191)

6 months
11 (#322,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?