Transition, Trust and Partial Legality: On Colleen Murphy’s A Moral Theory of Political Reconciliation

Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (1):153-164 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In A Moral Theory of Political Reconciliation Colleen Murphy develops a rich and potentially transformative account of political reconciliation. The potential of this account is not fully realized because of limitations in how Murphy conceptualizes political relationships. For example, group-differentiated integration into states opens up important questions about partial legality and group-differentiated experiences of repression that Murphy does not address. Murphy’s framework is well-suited to take up these questions, once they are acknowledged. But doing so requires a revised understanding of how states’ relationships with individuals structure individuals’ relationships with one another.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-05

Downloads
26 (#851,330)

6 months
4 (#1,247,093)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Cindy Holder
University of Victoria

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The politics of credibility.Karen Jones - 1993 - In Louise M. Antony & Charlotte Witt (eds.), A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

Add more references