The Structure of the Ordinals and the Interpretation of ZF in Double Extension Set Theory

Studia Logica 79 (3):357-372 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Andrzej Kisielewicz has proposed three systems of double extension set theory of which we have shown two to be inconsistent in an earlier paper. Kisielewicz presented an argument that the remaining system interprets ZF, which is defective: it actually shows that the surviving possibly consistent system of double extension set theory interprets ZF with Separation and Comprehension restricted to 0 formulas. We show that this system does interpret ZF, using an analysis of the structure of the ordinals.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,902

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Linear Set Theory.Masaru Shirahata - 1994 - Dissertation, Stanford University
A partial model of NF with ZF.Nando Prati - 1993 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 39 (1):274-278.
A New Approach to Predicative Set Theory.Arnon Avron - 2010 - In Ralf Schindler (ed.), Ways of Proof Theory. De Gruyter. pp. 31-64.
Models of set theory with definable ordinals.Ali Enayat - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (3):363-385.
On the syntax of logic and set theory.Lucius T. Schoenbaum - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (4):568-599.
On The Syntax Of Logic And Set Theory.Lucius Schoenbauma1 - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (4):568-599.
Is there a set of reals not in K(R)?Daniel W. Cunningham - 1998 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 92 (2):161-210.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
60 (#352,930)

6 months
9 (#464,038)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ackermann's set theory equals ZF.William N. Reinhardt - 1970 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 2 (2):189.
A very strong set theory?Andrzej Kisielewicz - 1998 - Studia Logica 61 (2):171-178.

Add more references