Laissez Faire Sex Selection—A Response to Edgar Dahl

Health Care Analysis 13 (1):91-93 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This response to Edgar Dahl’s paper in this issue of Health Care Analysis clarifies my argument concerning sex selection and shows that our disagreement is less than he believes it is

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10728-005-2573-5

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,716

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Sex Selection: Laissez Faire or Family Balancing?Edgar Dahl - 2005 - Health Care Analysis 13 (1):87-90.
Like a Frog in Boiling Water: The Public, the HFEA and Sex Selection.Søren Holm - 2004 - Health Care Analysis 12 (1):27-39.
Sex Selection, Child Welfare and Risk: A Critique of the HFEA's Recommendations on Sex Selection.Juliet Tizzard - 2004 - Health Care Analysis 12 (1):61-68.
The Ethics of Nonmedical Sex Selection.H. Strange & R. Chadwick - 2010 - Health Care Analysis 18 (3):252-266.
Sex Selection: Some Ethical And Policy Considerations. [REVIEW]Eike-Henner W. Kluge - 2007 - Health Care Analysis 15 (2):73-89.
The Ten Most Common Objections to Sex Selection and Why They Fail To Be Conclusive.Edgar Dahl - 2007 - Reproductive Biomedicine Online 14 (1):158-161.
Parental Love and the Ethics of Sex Selection.Peter Herissone-Kelly - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (3):326-335.
Sex Selection and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: A Response to the Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.Edgar Dahl & Julian Savulescu - 2000 - Human Reproduction 15 (9):1879-1880.
The Prohibition of Sex Selection for Social Reasons in the United Kingdom: Public Opinion Trumps Reproductive Liberty?Peter Herissone-Kelly - 2006 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15 (3):261-272.
Acting parentally: an argument against sex selection.R. McDougall - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (10):601-605.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
33 (#769,021)

6 months
4 (#1,015,689)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Sex Selection: Laissez Faire or Family Balancing?Edgar Dahl - 2005 - Health Care Analysis 13 (1):87-90.

Add more references